Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Marshall's avatar

This almost certainly is less influential on the future than Revelation, but it would’ve felt weird if Who hadn’t done a big cyberpunk steal in the early 1990s.

The prologue to this book is a thing of beauty. Totally Cartmel’s character statement for the Doctor. I also love how the whole thing really comes down to him not factoring in the rogue element of two people falling in love.

There is a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it shot of this story’s Butler Institute in 2008’s The Poison Sky, when the Sontaran gas is being burned out of the atmosphere.

Expand full comment
Scurra's avatar

I do understand why you did this, but I think skipping over Time's Crucible seems odd, because if anything, that's the real 'trilogy' - Cornell established the new baseline and Cartmell shows where he might have taken the show in the future if he had had the chance, but it's Platt who pillages the past to create a Gallifrey that does what Chibnall also decided to do - re-examine the bits and pieces of the 'canon' and then rewrite the history wholesale to give a new bunch of 'loose ends' that could be taken up later (and, in the case of Faction Paradox, thrown about with great force.)

So I guess skipping it does make some sense given that, whereas Revelation and Warhead are still largely intact in the retcon game (indeed they may even be more 'canon' than some tv stories!), Time's Crucible has been very much written over (by both Hell Bent and then The Timeless Children/Flux.)

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts